時間：2011-08-31 13:49來源：藍天飛行翻譯 作者：航空 點擊：次
|
The same commentor then stated that IEM No.1 to the proposed definition ‘blurred’ the distinction between aerial work and commercial passenger carriage. The DEFWG disagrees, and feels that the examples are realistic and do no more than reflect the current understanding of aerial work. The example (c) will be improved to make this more obvious. After a review of the comments and a detailed discussion, the DEFWG modified the definition so that it is simply related to the technical aspects of what aerial work is, and does not address remuneration at all. This answered most of the questions on the status of Aerial Work, and the relationship between what is private and what is commercial. The IEM will also be modified to remove reference to ‘cargo’ – the purpose of the IEM is to address restrictions on additional persons. However, this all assumes that JAR–OPS & JAR–FCL will address the differences between remunerated activities and private ones. This means that a number of comments have not been fully addressed as they will need to be considered as part of the work relating to Commercial and/or Private Aerial Work. They will be forwarded to the relevant drafting groups for their review prior to the commencement of that work. However, following the above, the JAAC, during the adoption of the NPA, decided that the ICAO Annex VI definition should be used, and JAR–1 now reflects this decision. This implies that the draft definition and proposed IEM are withdrawn in favour of the ICAO text. Proposal 7; Corporate Aviation Two commentors proposed to delete the term as it is not covered by JAR–OPS yet. However, such a definition is considered a necessary complement to the definition of Commercial Air Transportation, and the DEFWG continued with its development of a definition. During the Regulation Advisory Panel’s review of the DEFWG’s output, it was agreed, for the time being, to remove the term pending the JAAC’s advice on a policy view for the future. The Panel’s concerns centred on the differing treatment of Corporate Aviation in JAA States. |
